Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Larsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Automatic  Strikeout   ( T  •  C ) 02:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Alexandra Larsson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional. Does not meet any of the notability criteria for entertainers: "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" (no); "has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following" (no); "has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" (no). AfD at Wikipedia in Spanish. Technopat (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Neutral - Borderline. It's always difficult to tell without English-language sources.  However, it is definitely in serious need of cleanup! Deb (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Author opinion - I know that it's a mess, I will clean it up when I have time. About the notability, there was a time when this woman was always on TV at prime time. Also there was some controversy regarding extortion with a sextape, that make her appear on every newspaper in the country. (you can see when that happened here). It's easily notable by english wikipedia notability standards, but the article is a very messy stub, I know. Give me some time. By the way, the spanish Wikipedia has a very different criteria for TV personalities and its full of deletionists.--Neo139 (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: She appears to be a self-perpetuating famous for being famous person in Argentina, and the coverage meets WP:GNG, e.g.,,   The votes in the spanish AfD didn't like that, but also complained that their article was in poor condition and promotional, which simply means it should be improved.--Milowent • hasspoken  05:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Did a little bit of work on the article, she's even more notable that I judged earlier, Argentine media is over all her.--Milowent • hasspoken 15:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 22:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC)




 * Weak keep - yeah, I can understand the nomination but I find myself convinced by Milowent's arguments and the improvements that have been made to the article. Thought I can't read the WP:NOENG sources, they certainly seem to be from reliable publications and would seem to cover the subject in some detail. Stalwart 111  23:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG as the subject of multiple substantial independently-published pieces of coverage, per Milowent. Carrite (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article needs expansion not deletion. Hmlarson (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to be covered enough to meet WP:GNG, in my opinion. Ducknish (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.