Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexei Beltyukov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Alexei Beltyukov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite the long list of references in the article, none of the links work for me. I had a search in factiva for some of the titles with no luck and then tried the name instead. The only reliable sources I could find relate to charges of embezzlement e.g. made in 2013 that lead to his resignation - see page 4 of. The subject doesn't appear to be notable and the content in the article is entirely unverifiable to my knowledge. The user who created it is almost certainly a paid editor e.g. also working on Josh Swade and are both related to this editor group. SmartSE (talk) 22:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - There are no reliable sources. The first three reference links are dead and one reference has no links.  5 quotes the subject once.  6 & 7 are dead.  8 just quotes Alexei Beltyukov as a McKinsey & Co consultant.  9 is just a McKinsey report that does not discuss the subject. 10 is dead.  11 is in Russian and requires a subscription.  12-15 are dead.  16 references the subject once allegedly as helping to create a scholarship.--Rpclod (talk) 03:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.