Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexey Yanushevsky (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Alexey Yanushevsky
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable professional gamer. Ridernyc (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lack of reliable, third party sources. Notability not established. Sergecross73   msg me   20:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - This was Kept way back in 2008, as the sources then present were enough to show that the subject met WP:ATHLETE as a top competitor in a world-class event or events. On that standard... I dunno, this might still qualify. I do know that our BLP standards are much stricter now, however. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I saw that as well, but it appears that consensus has changed. There have been 4-5 other similar articles from about a week ago, that have been deleted that are virtually exactly like this, and consensus there was that WP:Athlete did not apply. Sergecross73   msg me   14:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You can see what I'm talking about here, there are 6 of them below the AFDs for "Parallel Kingdoms" and "MeetYourMakers". Sergecross73   msg me   14:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Consensus is also now that WP:Athlete has nothing to to do with professional gamers. Ridernyc (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  02:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.