Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexina Calvert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of British supercentenarians § British supercentenarians. (WP:SNOW). North America1000 01:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Alexina Calvert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As usual, born-married-worked-died. Fluff includes, "Calvert celebrated her 110th birthday in 2008; visitors left gifts of flowers and chocolate, and Calvert's 85-year-old daughter was also present." WP:NOPAGE, WP:PERMASTUB EEng (talk) 02:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of British supercentenarians. WP:LPI with no claim of significance beyond her age. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I must say the LPI point is one frequently applicable to these longevity subjects. EEng (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect Agree with the position of redirecting.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 09:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect Concur with the above. Also, WP:LPI is a significant point that ought to be brought up more often in these longevity-based bio AfDs. Yiosie  2356 16:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect No significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. Nothing but WP:ROUTINE info in the "article". Should not be a stand=alone article, per WP:NOPAGE. Fancruft accreted onto WP by hobbyists. Wikipedia is not a WP:MEMORIAL. It's not a web-hosting service for longevity hobbyists. David in DC (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of British supercentenarians. Non-notable person who received marginal coverage on the sole basis of age.  Better covered as a one- or two-sentence entry in the British supercentenarians list.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.