Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Monga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Alexis Monga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed/declined. His party might be notable, but can't find much that says he is. Most references seem to be to Facebook or Twitter. Ged UK  13:41, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  15:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Being a prominent executive member of a notable political party can be a valid claim of notability if the article is sourced well enough to satisfy WP:GNG, but it does not confer automatic inclusion rights on every such person who exists at all — particularly if their sourceability depends almost entirely on social media and blogs. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if a good version can be written and sourced. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a news google search on "Alexis Monga" came up blank. If he was notable, there would have been something.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This party has recieved notice, and he is the moving force behind the party. Unless people demonstrate that they have searched news media in the DR Congo and found no mention of Monga, we should keep it. To do otherwise would perpetuate systemic bias articles on non-western people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * News media from the Congo do come up on google news, but there are not hits on Alexis Monga.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.