Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Patterson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Alexis Patterson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very sad but not notable: see WP:BLP1E and WP:VICTIM. Only known for one event, her disappearance. Pam D  21:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOTNEWS. Meatsgains (talk) 23:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Tragic but not encyclopedic.Glendoremus (talk) 04:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - tragic, sad, heartbreaking. But, with that said, I regretfully !vote delete due to WP:NOTNEWS and the fact that it (in its current form) is not encyclopedic. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note gNews hits and at least 3 books discuss the case, also some scholarly articles, there may be an article here, the is raised  in academic journals and books in terms of news coverage disparity when a small, photogenic girl disappears in America depending on whether she is black or white.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What we have about the person is that she disappeared and that her disappearance is observed years later. The coverage of the event is local. The book hits are passing mentions among other examples of the lack of media interest in cases like this. It may not be fair, but RS support for a biography or a criminal event article appears to be insufficient. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per NOTNEWS Chetsford (talk) 19:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.