Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfa-Tsentr (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete

Consensus to delete appears to be clear here. Neither the notability nor the actual existence of this has been established during this AfD, as such, I am closing, and deleting the article in question. Questions or objections may be addressed to me at my talk page. — Ched : ?  23:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Alfa-Tsentr
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The db-repost has declined by because the article is substantially different. Please let this discussion run the full 7 days. Delete per the lack of reliable sources. I have been unable to find any sources on Google News Archive to verify this company's notability. Cunard (talk) 21:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - That's because the company doesn't exist. It is fictional, which is why it was deleted the first time as a hoax.  Other than that, there is no notability established outside of it's fictional world, hence, delete.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  21:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the game this is associated with is notable, then this could be made into a redirect to the main game page.  But since the article doesn't make it clear what game it's talking about, I don't know where to redirect. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Though this is the sort of thing that HOAX is talking about (an article about the hoax, not perpetrating the hoax), it isn't notable and I don't think we need to help with their marketing. Lankiveil was correct to decline the speedy, though posting the speedy was understandable. Protonk (talk) 21:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. It doesn't even say what game it's from. Evil saltine (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately it's not A7 b/c it's not real. Fictional corporations are not subject to A7. Nonetheless, delete as blatantly nn. Tim Song (talk) 00:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's part of the Junku Junsui ARG game, it should be on Wikipedia. It's like Umbrella Corporation or Nerv, but it form a part of an ARG Game, thanks. --Alv612 (talk) 22:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC) — Alv612 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. I don't think there is any verifiable information about this game, especially since it's an ARG which goes out of its way to be unverifiable (for example, by creating hoaxes to make their fictional world seem more real). The article is written almost entirely from an in-universe perspective, and there would be no way to rewrite it from a real-world perspective because the real world has no verifiable information about it. rspεεr (talk) 23:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Unless a defensible sourced article on the game itself can be written quickly, this article obviously has no chance; even so, it would be hard to justify as a separate article. I would suggest a try at converting it into an article on the game--as far as I can tell there has not even been an attempt at writing one.    DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is extremely relevant to the game itself, but the game itself has no article. In fact its debatable whether the game is of sufficient priority to merit an article right now. Especially considering the nature of the game makes it confusing and would mean the article would have to be constantly updated and verification for any information would be doubtful or sketchy at best. Of course the company doesn't exist so barring the game suddenly manifesting a good article on itself it ought to be swiftly deleted. Also: it's terribly written. I mean I had to stop three times just to be annoyed at grammar mistakes. --174.51.237.97 (talk) 07:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * As there's been nothing out-of-universe written about either the game or the in-universe company by reliable sources, I don't believe there is any choice but to delete the article. If future information becomes available, an article at Junku Junsui might be written, but right now there isn't actually anything known about the game.  Perhaps after its conclusion more might surface.  lifebaka++ 18:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.