Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfons hanson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete a7 and g1, no assertion of notability and a lot of patent nonsense. NawlinWiki 19:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Alfons hanson
Apparently a bunch of the stories told by the writer's teacher. Originally listed for speedy deletion as patent nonsense. I had the following conversation with the writer on the page's talk page:

What's your beef? How can you say this is patent nonsense if you don't know who he is? Alfons, my DT teacher often tells us stories of his life, and has pictures to back his stories up. He also tells us he invented funk in general, however, can't back this up, so i haven't written it. dig? •	A teacher's random stories aren't notable, are unverified, and have no place in an encylopedia. Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. Clamster5 17:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC) •	I beg to differ. He's played a large part in the bass community and the development of slap techniques. They aren't random and are varifiable. •	Then list web sources on the page that reflect that. Unverified and possibly made-up material isn't accepted on wikipedia. Clamster5 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC) •	I might add that word of mouth is just as an effective and reliable source of information than any old website. No doubt any sources i give you will be debated for their reliability purely because of the nature of the content. •	I'm going to list this on AFD so you can debate this out with someone else. Clamster5 17:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Clamster5 17:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete None of the claims can be verified. Appears to be a hoax/tall tale. Wildthing61476 18:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Strongshutthefuckup As i said, theres no point in me giving you a link, because you will just debate the reliablility; not for the site, but for the content, and your "alreadymadeupminds"
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.