Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Webre (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Alfred Webre
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I was originally going to strip away the dubious sourcing, but it seems pointless. Really nothing in this traces back to any place but Alfred Webre, and I cannot find any evidence that he has any traction outside the world of omnium gatherum fringiness. Note that in reading the article I would not assume that anything it says is actually true. Mangoe (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This WP:FRINGEBLP needs to be sourced to reliable independent sources for us to establish notability. I don't see any that we can use. jps (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - the previous closure was "no consensus", and the issues raised were not remedied since then. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no RSes. (PressTV completely fails to be one here.) No improvements in sourcing since previous AFD - David Gerard (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article is too fluffed and actually doesn't have that many good sources, a news search finds several results but nothing good and a wider search doesn't find anything better. SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - pure puffery (but note that Webre will not be a happy chappie: "My view is that Wikipedia's action continues to be part of the CIA time travel controlled US Presidency's retaliation against me for having exposed Soetoro/Obama's participation in a 1980-83 secret CIA jumproom project.") Paul B (talk) 19:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - not just fringe, non-notable fringe. Atsme &#9775;  Consult  00:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.