Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfredo Padilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Alfredo Padilla

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Others more knowledgeable about club level play in Colombia let me know if I'm off the mark. It is unclear if this young player has risen to the level of play to warrant an encyclopedia entry. He can be mentioned on the club entry so that seems adequate. The content is not directly sourced and seems outdated if the club article is accurate (not sourced in a language that I can read.) FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 15:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep If he has made appearances with the first team, then he meets the guidelines for professional footballers. This team is in the top flight in the Colombian leagues. article needs editing though. "new sensation of the season..." etc. could be cut. DarkAudit (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - he's made a number of appearances for the first team - 14 starts and 2 goals in the 2008 season according to this page though he doesn't appear to have played this season. This is a fully professional league - thus he meets WP:ATHLETE.Black Kite 22:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - He has played two seasons in the fully pro Copa Mustang (with Junior) and has now begun his third season (with La Equidad). I've updated the article, and it satisfies WP:ATHLETE. Jogurney (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for updating the article and adding the references. It is in much better shape now. :-)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.