Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algaeponics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Redirecting to Algae fuel afterwards.  Sandstein  18:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Algaeponics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hate to be a g-hit counter but this gets exactly 0. Contested prod. - Icewedge (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - first article I've seen to have zero g-hits... maybe the subject can be notable for that (joking!). Anyway, the article suggests that it is also a nelogism. Non-Notable Neologism. Nice phrase to use as a username... - Samuel  Tan  03:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: User should place this in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. The article does not indicate why it is notable for inclusion. – Jerry  teps  04:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect - to either Hydroponics or Algae ... both? It's only a sentence, and definitely should not be an article to itself. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. This term is so new that Google hasn't even heard of it yet, so I see no point in a redirect. Ten Pound Hammer Farfel  and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 05:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * delete Not only are there no general webhits but there are no google scholar, google books, blog hits, google groups hits either. The word shows up a handful of times in the linked to yahoo group where there is some disagreement over whether someone has a trademark on the word (and the people on both side seem to agree that the word is a neologism). The only other thing I can find using the word is that someone registered Algaeponics.info recently. JoshuaZ (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect Neologism for a process already mentioned in the Algaculture article. Needs redirect to Algaculture. That is all. Carson (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Correction -- redirect to Algaculture:Algae as an energy source; has more to do with the oil-as-in-petro-alternative than simply algae oil extraction. Carson (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hang on -- Good, Better, and Best: Algae fuel should be where this Redirects to. Carson (talk) 07:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.