Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algebraic Graviton Quantizing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Algebraic Graviton Quantizing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is based n a single source, which is a paper published in end of November 2012. This theory hence can not be notable at the moment. At best we have WP:TOOSOON. Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only reference is to a paper published in The General Science Journal, which, according to its own web site, publishes "scientific theories without prior and arbitrary assessment, criticism or rejection", i. e., without peer review. As an article dependent on a single source, it falls foul of WP:PRIMARY; as an article based on a single unreliable source, WP:GNG, and perhaps WP:NOT. Alexrexpvt (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no secondary sources independent of the primary source. The primary source itself is not peer-reviewed, rendering it unreliable. At this time, the topic fails to meet notability guidelines. When reliable independent secondary sources become available, re-creation is reasonable. Mark viking (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agreed. Nothing short of an earth-shaking scientific breakthrough becomes notable that fast, especially with the lack of reliable secondary sources. הסרפד  (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 20:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * snowball Delete - lack of third party references. - Altenmann >t 20:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of secondary sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete - per WP:SNOW --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.