Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alger Chapman Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Hog Farm Talk 16:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Alger Chapman Jr.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The entire article uses only one source, and a quick google search yielded next to nothing. Fails WP:GNG. Bettydaisies (talk) 04:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 21.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 04:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep you didn't find more sources because this isn't his most common name. See here, here, and here for some of the other sources.--User:Namiba 13:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only uses one reference in entire article which isn.t of WP:GNG standard. If    wants to make the article stick, they should consider the references they mentioned above into the article. CAVETOWNFAN (talk) 14:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, a pass of GNG is based off the existence of sources, not whether they are in the article. The sources found by Namiba are enough for a GNG pass. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep tentatively, once the sources found are added, then it would pass WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep A notable subject with significant coverage in reliable independent sources. I doubt if the nominator performed a before search before nominating this article for deletion. I will now add a few sources. Luciapop (talk) 13:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.