Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algernon Henry Barkworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Algernon Henry Barkworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable passenger of the Titanic; minimal RS coverage outside of this single event. –dlthewave ☎ 22:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:Oneevent, no indication of any notability apart from it; the implication (now removed) that the person's sexual orientation might imply some notability is peculiarly unencyclopaedic as well as being unsourced. I've stubbed the page because of blatant copyright violations (largely copied from this source) – please see Contributor copyright investigations/Elisa.rolle. Assuming the page is deleted, no objection to subsequent creation of a redirect to Passengers of the RMS Titanic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:44, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Deletea non-notable Titanic passenger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails notability requirements, only significant for WP:ONEEVENT --DannyS712 (talk) 21:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of INDEPTH sources on this individual, BIO1eE. Icewhiz (talk) 13:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete.  Not enough coverage in sources, not enough sources. As stated above WP:Oneevent comes into play here as the coverage of him didn't last long and if it is even mentioned today it's trivial at best. JC7V (talk) 05:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.