Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algie Composite Aircraft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Algie Composite Aircraft

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP and appears to be a case of advertising for a non-notable company. As it stands now, apparently its aircraft kit is under development (according to our article). But with less than 300 ghits and most of them (all?) to trade sites, this article should be deleted until such a time as this company has a product for sale that attracts sufficient notice to pass the notability guidelines. Bali ultimate (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above concerns. I was also unable to find any significant coverage of this company in independant, reliable sources that would 1. justify notability and 2. lead to proper encyclopedic coverage of the topic.  Them  From  Space  19:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I note that the reference to WP:CORP lists "All cars that have had Haynes Manuals written about them satisfy this criterion." This product has in fact had significant articles written, notably see the cover on http://www.amazon.com/Fiberglass-Other-Composite-MaterialsHP1498-AutomotiveRacing/dp/1557884986/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1239549615&sr=8-1 This link should qualify it for permanent addition according to Wiki standards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DAlgie (talk • contribs) 15:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope. This, you may have noticed, is not a car, much less a car about which Haynes Manuals have been written. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete – I see a bunch of generic trivial descriptions and mirrors, but nothing that would close to independent and significant in coverage. MuZemike 01:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:UPANDCOMING firm that doesn't even have a product yet. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.