Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorhythm (festival)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 22:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Algorhythm (festival)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inadequate sources for notability of this local college festival.  DGG ( talk ) 04:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sources in the article, or sources in the world at large? Unscintillating (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


 * keep and stubify. The tech festival thing is quite common among the IITs and engineering colleges in India. Since Jamia Millia Islamia is one of the top (though not primarily engineering college) I think the article can be made encyclopedic. The current article has some puffery but I think this article can be made a valid stub. The Legend   of Zorro  02:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep I don't know why this article has been listed here and I don't know why it was relisted.  I see no obvious problems with WP:V, and it is not a high-risk topic.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - tech festivals in India aren't uncommon. I recall !voting keep on at least on at least one some time in the past.  However, this one does not appear to meet notability guidelines.  I can find no significant coverage about it in independent reliable sources.  -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet any of the raft of guidelines, in fact the article does not make a reasoned claim to why it is notable so could be a CSD A7.  LGA talk  edits   00:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.