Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alhaji Adamu Bello


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep all. Mailer Diablo 13:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Alhaji Adamu Bello
Abandoned by its creator. Doesn't convey any real information right now. Delete unless someone actually puts information here. --Nlu (talk) 06:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating:


 * Chinwe Obaji
 * Kema Chikwe
 * Cornelius Adebayo
 * Mohammed Abba Gana
 * Idris Waziri
 * Saidu Samaila Sambawa
 * Hassan Muhammed Lawal
 * Fabian Osuji
 * Magaji Muhammed
 * Bayo Ojo
 * Eyitayo Lambo

For the same reason. --Nlu (talk) 06:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

BUSINESS OF THIS GREAT MAGNITUDE--the massive cleanup of articles created with empty templates and left to die. Cursory checks of Google show that at least some of these guys can be verifiably confirmed as people holding these ministry positions, meaning they don't fail WP:BIO. -- H·G (words/works) 07:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nigeria is the largest country in Africa. It is proper that WP has articles on its Government Ministers. I hope this will attract some interest. --Bduke 07:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all that are just a mishmash ("Minister of ??" sort of things). The fact that Nigeria is the most populous (not largest) country in Africa notwithstanding, the articles would need to cover more ground than this to be keepable. BigHaz 07:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. DEAR SIRS, I GOT YOUR CONTACT FROM A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE THAT INFORMED ME YOU HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF TRANSACTING A
 * Comment I should phrase this better to be more clear--meets WP:BIO as political figures verifiably holding national offices. -- H·G (words/works) 07:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and cleanup. Being a minister in a large country is inherently notable.  Stubbiness is not a deletion criterion. -- GWO
 * Keep per Gareth. The articles need to be fleshed out, but the subjects are notable. Cheers to HumbleGod for the good laugh. GassyGuy 09:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'll give them some cleanup. Punkmorten 09:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, but the information about them isn't plentiful. But at least the ugliness is gone. Punkmorten 21:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all the stubs are of notable people and with Punkmorten cleaning them up, I'm sure the notability will be verified, and who knows? Perhaps one day we'll see one of these articles on the main page   hoopydink  Conas tá tú? 15:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Park3r 15:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  17:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. We should encourage the creation of such articles.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Yay for systemic bias.  --ColourBurst 16:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep stubs. Ste4k 03:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * keep and please help reverse systemic bias Yuckfoo 07:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.