Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alhaqeqa Aldawlia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Alhaqeqa Aldawlia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Satellite TV channel based in Jordan that fails WP:NCORP. No independent secondary sourcing at all that I can find; the sources in the article are either database sources (Lyngsat, Jordanian government databases) excluded for notability by WP:ORGCRIT or fail verification entirely. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment. The editor who created this article has declared a conflict of interest with this subject so we must be especially vigilant to validate notability here. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Television,  and Jordan.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: A TV channel that doesn't meet the general notability guidelines. There is absolutely nothing to demonstrate notability and significance. The four sources, , , and are vagues that doesn't even say anything credible or a handful about the station. If not already in discussion or have exceeded the time, it could have been speedy deletion (A1). Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 17:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.