Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Sajid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Ali Sajid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage found. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Störm  (talk)  18:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. He appears to be the author of "Critical analysis of Six Sigma implementation" with 125 citations on Google scholar, but that alone isn't enough for WP:PROF and any other publications appear to have significantly lower citations. The references in the article don't support notability of any kind, and I didn't find much else in a search. But there may be a language barrier involved and I'm open to changing my mind if a pass of WP:GNG can be demonstrated through in-depth reliable independent sourcing. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - if the claims made in the article are true then it needs improvements, not deletion. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 05:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.