Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Shah Bukhari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Ali Shah Bukhari

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article is a full promo and there is nothing that suggests notability. According to only one significant article about him in Greater Kashmir, he ran for Legislative Assembly elections several times, but did he even win? I fail to find any sources. This fails GNG, and there is nothing that helps WP:NPOL being met. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  11:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Islam,  and India. ─  The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  11:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Norm and It has a lot of copyrighted stuffs which I removed.  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  15:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The editor who created the article says that the newspaper copied the material from Wikipedia and, from what I can see they are correct. Wikipedia's content predates the news report by a couple of years. --RegentsPark (comment) 00:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Well RP, then this article has been a blatant OR piece ever since it has existed on this encyclopedia. We do not have any other sources that verify this information, apart from the Greater Kashmir piece, which is interestingly a copy-paste newspaper piece of this very Wikipedia article. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  10:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * My comment was only about the copyvio. The rest is ...! --RegentsPark (comment) 12:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.