Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Sheharyar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Ali Sheharyar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG - Nott Nott &#124;talk 17:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: As I mentioned on the PROD tag which was removed by IP user, the article about living person fails general notability criteria and notability of people. All sources cited here are blogs which fails verifiability. The Huffington Post article cited in this article is a self published source. Ayub 407 talk 17:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Whether the WP:PROD tag was removed by an "IP user" (are there really any users who manage to edit without using IP?) or by someone who prefers to use a pseudonym than to reveal their IP address is immaterial. Once anyone has removed a PROD tag you can't reinstate it. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I have just removed three references from the article to apparently reliable sources that are actually about other people with vaguely similar names. None of the other sources, nor any that I can find online, come anywhere close to the significant coverage in independent reliable sources demanded by our notability guidelines. Given the subject matter I would expect any such sources, if they existed, to be available online. Please note that most sources found by a search for "Ali Haider" are about Ali Haider Gillani, not this guy. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable YouTube personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as another classic example of an article only consisting of the subject's own websites and sources, that has the bare signs there is nothing actually substantial at all. SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.