Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali al-Jarrah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Israel–Lebanon relations. With socks and other nonsense discounted, consensus is clear Star   Mississippi  01:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Ali al-Jarrah

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As noted by another user, coverage does not extend beyond arrest and legal consequences. Significant coverage implies that the subject has been featured in multiple sources over a period of time, contributing to a well-rounded biography.


 * Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Individual is not notable. Syrianpoet94 (talk) 05:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Struck as confirmed sock of Peacefulparrot5, the nominator.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Blocked for abusive use of accounts. gidonb (talk) 14:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete The article fails to demonstrate the subject's notability beyond a single event that lacks significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources Peacefulparrot5 (talk) 05:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC) - Struck, Peacefulparrot5 is the nominator (unsigned).--Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks significant coverage proving notability. 199.111.212.39 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This is the IP's 4th edit. gidonb (talk) 01:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete genereal lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:GNG. Only noteable for a single event (arrest). Peacefulparrot5 (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC) - Struck.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You seem to have accidentally voted twice. Would you be so kind as to strike your vote? FortunateSons (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * FortunateSons, user also nominated the article anonymously without signing. I would not be surprised if all opinions above are by the same person. gidonb (talk) 01:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Well that would be a gross violation of the rules. It would make sense based on the voting pattern, which is somewhat suspicious. FortunateSons (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It sure is a gross violation of our rules! gidonb (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Military, Israel,  and Lebanon.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge (selectively) into Israel–Lebanon relations, a target section that lacks detail and sources, and provides greater context to this affair. There is tons of coverage in Israel RS in 2008. One would assume that the Lebanese press was even before on the story. The international press picked it up in 2009. The Israeli press didn't let go in 2009 either. I did not see that the coverage was sustained beyond – maybe in Lebanon – yet the proposed ATD works in WP's benefit regardless of notability. gidonb (talk) 02:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge per the arguments by Gidonb, we should merge to maintain valuable content insofar as it meets the requirements of RS. FortunateSons (talk) 10:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge its a plausible search term and Israel–Lebanon relations is an appropriate merge target. Ben Azura (talk) 08:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.