Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali f awada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Ali f awada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nice 17-year-old kid who's been in self-produced short films and one commercial. Just enough significance asserted to avoid CSD, but clearly non-notable. TransporterMan ( TALK ) 14:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Written by Ali himself. I couldn't find any sources (reliable or otherwise) on the internet besides the self-published ones linked to in the article. Subject simply doesn't warrant an article. &mdash;Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent references found. Article also appears as the creator's user page, where it has already been speedied there three times per WP:CSD (blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host). -- Finngall   talk  15:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Make that 5 times until the user page was salted and now he's taken to posting it on his talk page where it has also now been reverted several times, sans clue. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 18:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. Written for self-promotion. Cowlibob (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional bollox that serves no purpose here!. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  18:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can not find any independent secondary sources that discuss the subject or his work... he is not notable enough for an article at this point in his career. And the fact that the article was written by the subject himself makes it overly self-promotion.  If and when independent secondary sources do start to discuss the subject and his work, I would have no objection to someone else (not the subject himself) recreating the article. Blueboar (talk) 15:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:RS and WP:GNG. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. and as above. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:CREATIVE. --Bejnar (talk) 23:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.