Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali je povezava med dolžino prstov in drugimi deli?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by admin User:Anthony Bradbury per A10. (non-admin closure) Harsh (talk)  16:02, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Ali je povezava med dolžino prstov in drugimi deli?

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

orphan and written in slovenian. No action happened after it created Magioladitis (talk) 11:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Being an orphan isn't grounds for deletion of an otherwise qualifying article. Being written in Slovenian is already dealt with via the procedures at WP:Pages needing translation into English: if the article isn't translated, it'll be gone by the 29th anyway. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: From what I can see using Google Translate, the article is pretty much just an article about correlations between someone's finger and so-on, but as a way of explaining correlations in general. It's predominantly written in an OR tone and looks to be someone's personal essay. It doesn't really expand anything from Correlation and dependence in the slightest, so I'm awfully tempted to speedy it as a newly created article that doesn't expand on a pre-existing article. If anyone wants to userfy the content I'll transfer it if they want to translate/salvage any of it, but there really isn't much here that isn't OR and expands on the article we already have. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Aw, gee, Tokyogirl79! :-) Since it is now no longer entirely in Slovenian, it wouldn't be deleted under WP:PNT, so now I do have to opine here. From the last two sections, it is clear that this is a first-person essay, a synthesis from a few sources, complete with a final section on personally drawn conclusions. I haven't done a thorough cross check but I'm pretty sure that everything here that's factual and notable is covered under other articles like Phrenology and Digit ratio. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedily Deleted by User:Anthony Bradbury. What kind of close would you call it? MM ("Well? What have you got to report?")  ("My new invention!") 15:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I deleted it as A10, duplication of an existing article.. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

I mean what kind of close on the AFD? Speedy Deleted? Yknow what I've just answered my own question there. *blinkblink* MM ("Well? What have you got to report?")  ("My new invention!") 15:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.