Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Donut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Jay  Jay What did I do? 22:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Alice Donut

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Cannot find anything to suggest notability, fails WP:BAND  Jay  Jay What did I do? 19:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep As the one who tagged for notability this only-one-reference (and that non-independent) article, I might be expected to !vote delete. The nomination obliged me to complete a more thorough search, however. The results were five newspaper/magazine articles, and a paragraph in a book, all of which I've added to a further reading section in the article. It's enough to pass WP:BAND criterion #1. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't like to say this, but this is a WP:BEFORE failure. Well-known punk band from the late '80s. Shedloads of coverage in paper publications of the time, you can see some of it in GBooks. Still get coverage in GNews. This is not a good nomination - David Gerard (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep User Worldbruce edits should alleviate any concerns about this article not being properly sourced. ShelbyMarion (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The first few pages of a Google search on the band name contain enough to make notability obvious. --Michig (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.