Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Sakitnak Akammak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It turns out that the deletion request by the now-blocked IP was some kind of trolling attempt.  Sandstein  19:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Alice Sakitnak Akammak

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural, completing the AFD nom for, who added the template but did not finish the nomination. --- Possibly (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - The deletion request by IP is retaliatory in nature. Netherzone (talk) 16:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes it is pretty pointless as far as I can see (meets WP:ARTIST 4.d) but we have in the past entertained badly formed AFD requests by disruptive editors. The alternative was to delete the malformed AfD request, which I did, but then reconsidered.--- Possibly (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - The subject of the article meets notability criteria for WP:ARTIST as her work has been collected by several museums. All of these collections are verifiable. Netherzone (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as above, Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep represented in the collections of the McMichael Canadian Art Collection, Winnipeg Art Gallery and Peary-MacMillan Arctic Museum. Vexations (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, a permanent block or ban for the nominating IP and their socks please. Vexations (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the notoriety of the subject. Do not base the entire article on original primary sources directly involved. User Vexations You must allow your opinion and comment on the subject in question, this is not a fascism or Nazi dictatorship asking for an indiscriminate blockade without arguments.--85.84.33.17 (talk) 12:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sorginak/Archive. I have a list of some 20 IP related to that account. 85.84.33.17 is one of them. Vexations (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - There is something called a presumption of innocence and that investigation has no course whatsoever, it is just a retaliation for the editor's ego. It is noted that you are an intimate "friend" of Possibly, but here what is nominated is the Article for deletion by Alice Sakitnak Akammak that lacks independent sources. That said, user Netherzone speaks of retaliation. It is necessary to remember that the real retaliation is generated by your group of friends: Netherzone, Possibly, Vexations, and SlimVirgin. A group that always goes together and supports and defends each other. The bad thing is that they also get together for retaliation and conspire against who dares to criticize them, becoming the rustler group, an organized group (mafia) of wikipedia. That said, you can block me. I'd rather die standing than live kneeling. Your group is also being investigated for a long time. Greetings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.84.33.17 (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - I will NOT defend myself against that absurd accusation because I almost always forget to log in, so the different IPs are generated and when I remember to log in I forget the password. That is not a crime. Greetings and more serious is yours. You are always the same.--85.84.33.17 (talk) 13:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep NARTIST 4(d), and OMG what a bunch of trollery from that IP. Sorry about that. Theredproject (talk) 19:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ARTIST 4(d) Beccaynr (talk) 04:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.