Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Y. Ting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Alice Y. Ting

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is more or less a call for clarification: is the National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award sufficiently prestigious to fit under WP:PROF's #2 criterion? If so, perhaps it should not be deleted. If not, I see nothing about this professor that is sufficiently notable otherwise. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 01:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as passing WP:PROF. Google scholar shows seven papers with over 100 citations each, two as first author . That said, I doubt the award meets #C2; it looks less like a prize for distinguished research and more like a research grant to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. GS h index of 21 in a well cited field is probably sufficient to pass WP:Prof. Nominator should read WP:Prof and do WP:Before before creating more AfDs. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Publication record insufficient to meet WP:PROF C1. The one national award she received is not sufficiently prestigious as suggested by the nom to meet WP:PROF C2. It's an award given to support research with potential and promise. This is not what C2 is getting at. I have little doubt that within a few years Ting will easily pass WP:PROF on several criteria levels, but not yet. --Crunch (talk) 13:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.