Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Blake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 02:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Alicia Blake

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NCOLLATH. My Google searches for "Alicia Blake" washington softball and "Alicia Matthews" washington softball (Matthews is her maiden name) returned little beyond routine local media coverage from her college softball career. Thus, she has not "[g]ained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team" as is required in WP:NCOLLATH.

Additionally, her online biography on the University of Washington Athletics website does not indicate any national awards or NCAA Division I records broken, other requirements for college athlete notability. Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Softball-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails NCOLLATH, no evidence she passes the GNG. The article creator put up a few more of these to boot, eight years ago.  Nha Trang  Allons! 17:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete college softball players are rarely notable for such, and nothing suggests this is an exception to that rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.