Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Rhodes (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails PORNBIO with listed award wins; no claims made to iconic or groundbreaking status. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 14:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Alicia Rhodes
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Scene awards no longer count so fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 21:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails both guidelines Rainbow unicorn (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I see no better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  08:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article seems to fulfil the WP:PORNBIO criteria adequately. Rhodes appeared in a very large number of films in the 2000s and was named in the titles of several of them (e.g.: "Virtual Sex with Alicia Rhodes", " When Layla Jade Met Alicia Rhodes"). She also won a number of non-scene awards (e.g.: best actress, female performer of the year) and made regular appearances on digital TV. Polly Tunnel (talk) 13:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - As stunning as she is unfortunately looks don't count towards notability, per the above Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO particularly because her UKAFTA award was for a video that doesn't exist . The UKAFTA is notoriously insignificant, and at least one award recipient is open about the fact that his "honor" was bought-and-paid-for. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Whatever one thinks about the UK Adult Film and Television Awards, the award in question there was a scene award that doesn't qualify under the current PORNBIO standards. The other apparent award win is for a simple online poll in a website's user forum. Guy1890 (talk) 05:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.