Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Yoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  A  Train talk 07:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Alicia Yoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero evidence of meeting notability standards  DGG ( talk ) 07:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Za  wl  17:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong keep, extensive coverage in reliable sources. I have added many to the article, including 20 paragraphs from the BBC . Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 23:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is extensive coverage in reliable sources. I mean, the BBC has a whole article about her. I can't understand how the subject of the article isn't notable. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  13:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail, resulting in a directory-like listing for an unremarkable entreprenuer. The BBC story is an interview. I also note that Peach & Lily has been recently deleted, with the deleting admin noting that the creator was suspected of being part of a sock farm. We generally don't keep articles on entrepreneurs whose only claim to notability is being CEO of a nn company. The WP:Promo concerns also apply. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * This article discusses the subject in detail:
 * Note that Peach & Lily was deleted via WP:PROD, which does not carry much weight as such a deletion can be overturned upon any request. Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 03:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note that Peach & Lily was deleted via WP:PROD, which does not carry much weight as such a deletion can be overturned upon any request. Antrocent (&#9835;&#9836;) 03:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment -- the brit.co source listed above is from Brit + Co, which is described as "a media company that inspires, educates, and entertains real women with a creative spirit through content, online classes, and creative products". For all we know, it's a promo piece that could have been placed there by the subject's publicists. I'd treat it as a WP:SPIP source. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: The sources quoted already show Yoon has made an important mark as an entrepreneur. Google reveals numerous other secondary sources if these are needed.--Ipigott (talk) 10:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I strongly think this should be kept, not least because of the extensive BBC article (which is not an interview). As others have said already, there are plenty of other reliable sources, some of which have been identified here. It's an obvious keep for me. Dysklyver  14:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep with perspective of editing. If it is possible to expand this article with information from different websites in English, Greek etc. and describe activity of Yoon's company in the same article. The subject may be notable, because Alicia Yoon is featured in many sources, but the article clearly needs editing.Tarja Kardash (talk) 15:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * — Tarja_Kardash (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.