Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Adventures (Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I am taking the unusual step of deleting this myself despite the fact that I commented here. The reasons are that there is obviously a WP:SNOW level of support for deletion, and I have just blocked the creator of this article, who is apparently also the writer, director, star, only person who even onows it exists in the first place, etc... so it is highly unlikely there are any improvements forthcoming that would change the situation. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Alien Adventures (Film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD, not-yet-existent, no indication of notability, and no indication that it's anything other than an amateur video production, presumably for YouTube.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:21, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As PROD endorser. Fails WP:NFILMS so badly that I feel dizzy. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * snowball delete because this article does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being kept. A no-name director, who is also the producer, writer, and star. A no-name production company That probably does not exist in any real way. Looks very much like kids planning to make a movie that will premiere on YouTube and probably not be seen by anyone who doesn't know the cast personally. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Perhaps we finally need a speedy deletion criterion for this sort of thing? I've been seeing a lot of these recently, and I can't imagine that it would be any more or less prone to problems than the present db-band process.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Good luck getting consensus on that, unfortunately. I must say though, I really chuckled when I saw the References section and "None Yet." below. That's a new one. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * New CSD categories are always a fight, but apart from getting a few buddies together and starting a band (and the accompanying Wikipedia article on the Next Big Thing), the next most popular activity is shooting a video project using the auteur's dad's video camera (and writing the accompanying Wikipedia article on the project).  Acroterion   (talk)   18:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * As much as y'all have a point - this conversation is irrelavent to this deletion discussion... CinephileMatt (talk) 04:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete- Based on the speedy deleted director and actors, it is a high school production. The director and lead actor was 17, and the other two actors linked were 18. Also, blurbs on all 3 pages indicate they go to the same high school. Not a professorial production, and definitely not notable. Jeancey (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I remember looking at this when it was being PRODed and not finding any sources at that point. Nothing about that has changed in the last few days. Fails WP:NFILM.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. As far as I can determine, this film has not been written about in any reliable sources.  Because it's a teenager, writing about a video she's making with her friends, and while I don't like to hurt the teen's feelings, not everything one does belongs in an international encyclopedia.   -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, found anything in my searches- Cavarrone (talk) 12:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or Incubate Per Too Soon/Lack of Significant coverage.CinephileMatt (talk) 04:17, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails WP:NFILM. It can have an article after it is made and becomes notable by acquiring reviews in mainstream sources, but not before. Antandrus  (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.