Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Hipporit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Alien Hipporit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of Ultraman Ace through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 11:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons:


 * Merge. None of these are really appropriate for a separate article, but the information should be retained and a redirect made. There's no reason given against merging or redirection. Notability is not required for content, just for a separate article. The form nomination used here does not address these issues, here or in the multiple other occurrences. As before, I  cannot understand "There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary" -- assuming that something sensible is intended, it might mean there is little likelihood for further growth in the article. I don't see how one can really tell it, but once merged, it can always be re-expanded if the information warrants it.  DGG ( talk ) 23:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all. All of these articles are non-notable and were created by a banned sockpuppet known for creating trivial articles and categories.  Yes, they could be merged somewhere, but the information (trivia sections, overly detailed plot summaries, and in-universe writing) is not encyclopedic and does not belong on Wikipedia.  If it is lost, then people will simply seek it elsewhere.  Wikipedia is under no obligation to provide an index of every fictional character ever created.  WP:ATD fully provides for the deletion of non-notable articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per NinjaRobotPirate. The article itself fails to establish the notability of the topic, per the complete absence of "significant coverage from multiple reliable independent sources" required by WP:GNG. NinjaRobotPirate makes a good argument against a merge, but whatever is decided, the article cannot stay as a stand-alone.Folken de Fanel (talk) 20:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.