Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Nackle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete & redirect. If the redirect is undone, it can be reverted and the redirect protected if necessary. KTC (talk) 00:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Alien Nackle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of The Return of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. A redirect does not seem necessary or warranted, but I'm not opposed to it.  It just seems a bit pointless. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  04:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: Redirects are cheap and in this instance will lead readers to the information they seek rather than inspiring them to recreate this article. - Dravecky (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Too often people simply undo the redirect, leaving us back where we started, with an untenable article. I would personally like to see the article deleted, and then a redirect created over the old deleted version, but I think that idea makes some people squeamish.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.