Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Shooter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep Alien Shooter: Vengeance, delete Alien Shooter and Zombie Shooter. If I'm reading this right, it looks as though Vengeance is sourced enough to either be considered notable or scrutinized on its own merits (and as such, I'd ask that if an AfD is opened for that article within the next couple days, it not be procedurally closed), but the other two don't have enough present to keep at this time. Next time, please consider separate AfD's. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Alien Shooter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Poorly sourced article about an independently developed computer game. Google chucks up a fair few hits, but these all seem to be download mirrors or other unreliable sources.

I am also nominating the following related pages because it's a sequel to the above, and suffers from the same problems.
 * Reyk YO!  02:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all, no reliable sources found. I added Alien Shooter: Vengeance to the list as well. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment- Good catch, I didn't find that third one. Reyk  YO!  02:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, why? It's had a GameSpot review sat in the external links since last year, an IGN review pops straight out of google . Someoneanother 08:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. These don't seem to be notable in and of themselves, and consist almost entirely of (in-universe!) plot synopses and information that could apply to most current video games.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 04:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Vengeance there's a GameZone review for Vengeance on the first page of google results:, easily passes notability between IGN, GameSpot and GameZone. Someoneanother 08:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * In addition, delete Alien Shooter and Zombie Shooter I'm finding no sources outside of a Game Tunnel review for each: [ and Zombie Shooter being an IndieGames.com 'indie game pick' - but all this means is you get a single one-paragraph blurb for the game, which is pretty much useless as a source. We would really need another full sized review for each game to scrape over the notability threshold and to give someone a chance of making a halfway decent article. [[User:Someone another|Someone]]another 00:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd strongly suggest removing Vengeance from this AFD so that we can scrutinize the other two games, it's going to distract participants from the other two which do need sources finding for them, or the chop. Someoneanother 21:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Alien Shooter: Vengeance is a notable games. It has reviews by IGN and GameSpot. The rest can be deleted. --SkyWalker (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep both per above. MuZemike (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep all can find appropriate sources to supplement the article, do not need to be deleted. --RekishiEJ (talk) 15:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.