Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alikadom Cave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Alikadom Cave

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Appears to be a non-notable cave. No hits on Google Books, Google News, or Google News archives. A general Google search for it turns up only ten results, all of which appear unreliable. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 16:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Plus most of the text is superfluous.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. The usual spelling in English of the location of this cave appears to be "Alikadam": . Phil Bridger (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment It's likely to have Bangladeshi sources, but the script is different. 86.** IP (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | speak _ 18:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * delete not verifiable. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.