Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alin Abuzătoaie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Alin Abuzătoaie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article about a footballer who has never played a fully professional match Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  —Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  —Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 03:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete "under contract" means "hasn't played yet" right?--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:52, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * He has played but only for Steaua's reserve team. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Alin Abuzătoaie played in Romanian first divison for 3 times in 2007. Why deleted and this page??????????????????????????????????????????????? 188.25.235.19 (talk) 05:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If you can provide a reliable source for this I will gladly withdraw this AfD. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments First, please refrain from personal attacks.  Second, the reasons to delete are quite clear in my view, generally because they do not meet the standards set forth in Wikipedia policies and guidelines--and specifically for the reasons outlined above in this discussion--specifically that the subject material does not meet our standards of notability.  You can read about that at WP:N, but bear in mind that notability is merely one of the standards to meet.  If you disagree, you can make comments here and point out to us why you believe the subject material does meet those standards and an impartial third party will evaluate the discussion to determine consensus.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.