Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alina Foley (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. My apologies for relisting this. Though some of the keep !votes could have been stronger, the consensus was clear. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Alina Foley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ENT. no multiple notable roles. LibStar (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Those are fairly large bookings for a child actress but there's probably no real coverage out of industry rags. I'm pretty close to being neutral on this but due to the previous nom I'll tend towards my current status. Shadowjams (talk) 08:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep For a 6-year-old to star next to Jackie Chan is pretty darn good, and since her roles have only improved over her life I don't see this as a stopping point by any stretch. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * we don't relax WP:ENT for 6 year olds. acting with someone notable does not make one notable. LibStar (talk) 07:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Having a significant role in a hugely popular major national show in addition to co-starring in a major studio distributed and internationally theatrically released film does demonstrate notability. --Oakshade (talk) 04:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * there is no evidence she had a substantial role in this film. LibStar (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes there is.--Oakshade (talk) 13:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. Being a BLP, a few more comments would be helpful before this is closed. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. I don't see a reason why this should be deleted, yet. Actresses and famous people, in my opinion should be kept, especially for someone young. Tommy2010 01:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * you have failed to address how she meets WP:BIO or WP:ENT. being someone young is not a criterion. LibStar (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Cautious keep Borderline notable, but inclined to think not good practice to re-nominate without good reason. PatGallacher (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Some notable appearances, needs an awful lot of work. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 17:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. Normally, a second relist with this many "keep" !votes would be uncalled for but considering that the subject is a living person, not a Pokemon, we need to get this one right. Now it seems to me that whether or not she passes WP:ENT is if the role she played in "The Spy Next Door" is "significant" so let's focus on that. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Has a few notable roles, both from 2008 Days of our Lives and The Spy Next Door CrimsonBlue (talk) 01:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.