Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisha Pradhan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Wifione  Message 03:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Alisha Pradhan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreliable sources fail to prove notability of the subject. Also the article claims no significance of the subject. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 13:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  13:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete about half the sources seem to fail (404 errors), but the one from Dhaka Tribune may count for something if an additional source could be found. Bjelleklang -  talk 18:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources found by User:Kmzayeem. Bjelleklang -  talk 08:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - per WP:GNG, found some significant coverage in reliable sources,, , , . -- Zayeem  (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete From what I can tell, most of the sources are fan magazines. The one English-language article talks of her career in the future tense. I'm seeing way WP:TOOSOON on this one. Time will tell. LaMona (talk) 00:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Prothom Alo, Banglanews24.com, Dhaka Tribune etc. are proper news portals, not fan magazines. Whatever tense they use, the coverage are significant enough to pass WP:GNG. -- Zayeem  (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 00:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Weak keep This sweep of Indian news sources did not reveal anything, but the English-source here looks solid. There is a middling source here. There are plenty of publicity photos here suggesting she is being promoted, although her pageview tallies (not an official measure of course) suggest she has not arrived yet. She may very well be notable in the world of Bangladeshi media, it is difficult for persons on the other side of the world here, examining English-language sources, to establish this notability. I could change my view based on new information.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Found an additional source here only a mention, another mention here (although looks like a press release). I used google translate to check out this source and it came up with "Alisha Pradhan was signed to appear in four films together. Carnival Motion Pictures of the four films will create a new production. The company will start with a ceremony today. Also today announced the four pictures. Alisha her mother husana a director of major corporations. There is a strong connection between the four pictures (Director farmer Nazrul Islam) and Mia Bibi agreed (Director Shahin Sumon). Alisha is the first and the second Simon Emon. The other two finalists were the story, but the film was not nominated. How to manage these two pictures Zakir Hussain and sohanura oz. All films will be made in digital technology." So I'm changing my vote from 'weak delete' to 'weak keep'.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kmzayeem. Becky Sayles (talk) 10:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.