Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison A. Carr-Chellman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Alison A. Carr-Chellman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A researcher who has published a few papers, doesn't meet the prof test. Tone is promotional, with her views presented as facts.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - wp:resume, would need a significant rewrite to be articleworthy.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  15:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. A GS h-index of 13 in a high cited field. Off to a good start but not there yet. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:46, 24 February 2014 (UTC).
 * Weak delete. I agree with Xxanthippe: she looks likely to eventually pass WP:PROF but not quite there yet. And the lack of non-primary sources is also a problem that can get better with more time. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - This article has considerable similarity to this bio. If kept, the article should be rewritten to be less similar. I don't consider this to be a case for CSD G12, which is why I haven't deleted it already. James086 Talk  20:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with Xxan and David. Agricola44 (talk) 18:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.