Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Garrigan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — freak([ talk]) 06:09, Sep. 30, 2006 (UTC)

Alison Garrigan


non-notable actress who's appearing in a local community theater production of Rocky Horror in Ohio. Fails WP:BIO and reeks of vanity. wikipediatrix 04:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and then burn the remains to ash, per nom. Some of the stuff that makes it here never fails to make me laugh. NeoFreak 05:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete She's the shiznit in the Cleveland theater scene, but hasn't extended outside that. The GHits I find seem to be all the usual local theater Ra! Ra! puffery - Richfife 05:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Why did she play Dr. Frank-N-Furter? Isn't the whole point of that character that he's a man dressing up as a woman? J I P  | Talk 09:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 09:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Leave. You all seem to be getting very hot under the collar about an article - like a group of shiznits. Who cares. There should be better reasons for deletion. It diverted me for a couple of minutes. Soane 16:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply Are you dissing my shiznittery? - Richfife 16:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply I guess so. I have now looked up the word. So I would say to you all: relax. Your venom is unbecoming. If each of you is worth a user page AND a talk page here, this person is worth one page. And there are countries smaller than Cleveland (Monaco is half the size of Central Park).Better in than out. Soane 17:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply I was kidding. On a more serious note, notability requirements on Wikipedia are an important way of keeping it from being completely inundated by random information about all 5 billion plus people on the planet, rendering it completely useless.  As it is, "How come I can't have an article when they can!" is a constant refrain from every person that can drink a glass of beer really fast or stand on their head or got straight A's once.  The line has to be drawn somewhere, and hubris popping is sometimes part of that. - Richfife 17:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * LeaveI would leave it. I thought she was interesting and would want to know more. NIghtjar 21:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Leave I'd like to know more too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.225.14.119 (talk • contribs)
 * Leave It seems worth keeping to me. There are articles about small towns of interest to a couple of thousand people. I am sure she is of interest to more than that. As a bisexual woman, as a dressmaker, I say let her stay. I don't understand the impulse to kill articles anyway. People should add to articles. RuthieK 20:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per the nominator, she does not yet meet our WP:BIO perhaps later. Yamaguchi先生 22:06, 29 September 2006
 * DElete Reasonably NPOV article but simply doesn't demonstrate enough notability. Spartaz 22:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.