Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alistair hanna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:05, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Alistair hanna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person lacks WP:Notability. Three sources are given, but one is Tweeter (not reliable), other two do not have wp:significant coverage. Searching Google for him in connection with his company returns few hits. mostly social networks. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to fail WP:BIO, notability not met.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  14:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to McKinsey & Company Doesn't appear notable. Piguy101 (talk) 16:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete General lack of notable coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Reference now added to assert notability. I have also moved the article to correct the capitalisation. -Racklever (talk) 07:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. His Bushmills Dunes golf resort seems to be poorly known. Brandmeistertalk  08:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep He was much more than just the promoter of the golf links near the Giants' Causeway. See revised article, which could do with more expansion from the listed sources. Clearly meets WP:GNG with plenty of coverage in independent reliable sources, not all of which are currently cited, such as The Daily Mail obit. --Bejnar (talk) 06:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  13:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.