Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alix Generous


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Alix Generous

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N and WP:ONEEVENT. Her only claim to notability is a TED talk; nearly every source cited is either about the TED talk, or is her own writing. She has done some scientific research, but it doesn't meet the criteria for WP:ACADEMIC. SMDWiki (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete one TED talk does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I did a Google search and the results are mostly her own websites/social media, and stuff about the TED talk. I agree that the TED talk doesn't make her notable and that the article should be deleted.SonOfSauron (talk) 06:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.