Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alka Ajith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. no consensus on whether meets WP:MUSICBIO JForget  01:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Alka Ajith

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete per WP:MUSICBIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC) 
 * Delete The article clearly looks like a self boasting one with a lot proof-less info's & does look like a fan designed self promoting article .--  Doctor muthu's muthu    wanna talk ? 18:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 03:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. The nomination, and the delete opinion above, do not explain why the sources in the article are inadequate for demonstrating notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:28, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Week Keep - she won one reality singing show for kids in Tamil Nadu in one channel. To my knowledge there are atleast three such shows running in Tamil channels. Previous winners of this show (both adult and children formats) have gone nowhere (no record deals, solo albums etc) except performing stage shows /promotional events for the same channel. News coverage dies out after the season is over. But it is not clearly the case here. She has an existing singing career - a 2004 album and professional singing tours --Sodabottle (talk) 06:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * This is a perfect Nomination & sure not the right one, if we keep having articles with less or no info;s then why a set of rules ? .....this article fails notability ...--  Doctor muthu's muthu    wanna talk ? 21:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * again, this is supposed to be a discussion about whether the article subject meets Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines, which are based on whether there is significant coverage in reliable sources. Please explain how the sources in the article are insufficient rather than saying "just not notable". Phil Bridger (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Inclusion in WP needs reliable sources and to be able to meet notability guidelines. This bio article does not meet the notability guidelines that I referred to. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I second you Alan Liefting .--  Doctor muthu's muthu    wanna talk ? 11:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 11:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – I added additional citations to articles from The Hindu just now. The subject meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.