Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-Consuming Fire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Virgin New Adventures. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

All-Consuming Fire

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I've tried to improve this article as much as I can, but I haven't been able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. As far as I can tell, almost every reference to the book is a trivial mention (talking about the crossover element of the story). The only source that appears to have significant coverage is Doctor Who Magazine. Since there's only one source, it fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. OliveYouBean (talk) 07:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Virgin New Adventures. ISFDB lists two reviews that are not yet cited in the article. The one in Dragon is accessible here and it's a capsule review. Presuming the other is as well (I couldn't find it online), I don't think there's quite enough to justify a standalone article, but the non-plot elements could be incorporated in the series article. Jfire (talk) 03:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Merge to Virgin New Adventures. I dont think there are enough sources to pass GNG, but this book has good reason to be merged. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 20:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.