Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllGame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to All Media Network. It seems like very few people want to keep the article as-is (and that person endorses a merger as well) but only one person wants to explicitly delete, most opinions are for redirecting with one for merge.Thus we shall redirect with people free to copy any worthwhile content over, using the most commonly cited redirect target Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

AllGame

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

(Defunct company) Collectively created to build a group corporate spam along with group company. All Media Network. Non-notable. only blatant promotion. Same type of content is used. Either merge into one, and as sold by TiVo Corporation (notable company) to make one articles. all these clusters of companies does not serve any encyclopedic purpose. Light2021 (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to All Media Network. Viable search term at the very least. I believe this was a prominent website earlier on, so there could be potential for an article someday. But the current one is barebones and poorly sourced, so its not worth keeping in its current state. Sergecross73   msg me  12:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTYELLOW; strictly promo and no value to the readers. All Media Network is at AfD itself. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Its not a great article, no, but it is a plausible search term. And I don't believe the redirect target is likely to actually be deleted. Not a great nom there. Sergecross73   msg me  23:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to All Media Network (with the history preserved under the redirect) in lieu of deletion. I agree with Sergecross73's analysis that "this was a prominent website earlier on, so there could be potential for an article someday". The history should be retained so that the redirect can be easily undone if more sources are found in the future and to allow for a merge to All Media Network. Cunard (talk) 23:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge - Keep, or merge to All Media Network or Michael Erlewine. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to All Media Network. Site on its own is not notable, but content should be moved as it has a lot of incoming links and is used as a reliable source. People will wonder what this is. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.