Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Aussie Guys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Petros471 15:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

All Aussie Guys
Non-notable blog, in existence for less than 3 months. There are 10 unique Google hits, all of which are other blogs or forums. Fails WP:WEB. Ted  Talk   14:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another blog. No notability seems to be asserted Ydam 14:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom/Ydam.-- Andeh 15:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB, the fact of its own existence is never enough for a website. Jammo (SM247) 23:22, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't fit standards for blogs being represented on wikipedia. Ans e ll  00:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:WEB and no references to it on an Australia New Zealand database. Capitalistroadster 02:52, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   --  Ans e ll  00:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blog. &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above.Blnguyen | rant-line 04:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all.  Carpenoctem (talk)
 * Delete. Non-notable.  --Roisterer 12:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn blog Computerjoe 's talk 19:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Chuq 23:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn and fails WP:WEB. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I@n &equiv; talk 03:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.