Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Eyez On Us (G-Unit Radio Part 5)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was close, please discuss redirects at WP:RfD, not here. Sr13 07:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

All Eyez On Us (G-Unit Radio Part 5)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

All these pages are redirects to G-Unit discography. These are such useless redirects with no significant articles linking to these pages. A previous afd (Articles for deletion/Smokin' Day 2 (G-Unit Radio Part 1)) resulted in a merge to the discography page where these mixtapes are already mentioned. Besides, these are mixtapes and can never be expanded beyond a mere track listing and thus fail WP:MUSIC. I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason: Spellcast 09:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No-one is typing "The Clean Up Man (G-Unit Radio Part 24)" by chance. Cedars 10:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. --Evb-wiki 12:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close and relist at WP:RFD as these are redirects. Otherwise delete. Otto4711 12:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy close per Otto4711, but also, if these articles are the source of merged content, I believe the redirects HAVE to remain to archive the content's edit history. Propaniac 12:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Some of those articles were deleted in the first afd (Articles for deletion/So Seductive (G-Unit Radio Part 12)). I just don't see the use in having redirects for non-notable mixtapes that should never have been created in the first place. Spellcast 13:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It was recreated and then merged. This means that the redirect must stay as long as the article it was merged to exists, because that's what the GFDL requires (see WP:COPYRIGHT). JulesH 13:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy close per above and note that these redirects do have edit history, therefore cannot be deleted unless the article they were merged to is also deleted. Therefore do not list at RFD. JulesH 13:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I know the result of the first afd I mentioned was officially a "merge". But the content of these articles were never actually merged into the main discography (it's too big). The titles of the mixtapes are simply mentioned in G-Unit discography with no merged content from the above articles whatsoever. Spellcast 13:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I havent checked them all, but for those I checked there seemed to be very little content not brought into them by Spellcast. Then the demand to save the articles history, when that very user asks them deleted, should vanish. . Greswik 13:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I started those articles when I was very new to Wikipedia. Looking back, I regret starting them and I wish I never did. I mean, these are mixtapes- they can never be expanded into a good article. At most, the names of these tapes deserve to be mentioned in the artist's discography and that's all. Nobody is going to type in "Back to Business (G-Unit Radio Part 14)". Spellcast 13:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom. --- Realest4Life 14:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.