Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Progressive Women's Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Also, nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. (non-admin closure)  HighKing++ 19:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

All India Progressive Women's Association

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

a non-notable organization fails WP:NORG. Lack of significant coverage from reliable resources which are independent of the subject. Previously deleted under A7 and G11. DMySon (talk) 08:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. DMySon(talk) 08:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Goldsztajn (talk) 02:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - AIPWA is a notable organization - https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/jalandhar/political-links-help-rapists-get-away-says-aipwa-secy-222559https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/jalandhar/political-links-help-rapists-get-away-says-aipwa-secy-222559, https://www.thehansindia.com/karnataka/aipwa-demands-criminal-action-against-sulli-deals-app-695206 , https://sabrangindia.in/article/hathras-rape-case-caste-supremacist-atrocity-aipwa , https://www.uniindia.com/story/AIPWA-demands-withdrawal-of-Centres-decision-to-raise-marriage-age-of-girls-to-21-years , https://www.hindustantimes.com/patna/bhojpur-incident-result-of-land-dispute-between-locals-nut-community-woman-targeted-under-plan-aipwa/story-5waJkwGKHCs7ZE46ufURZJ.html , https://udaipurtimes.com/issues/women-association-aipwa-gave-memorandum-addressing-chief/c74416-w2859-cid108073-s10706.htm , https://siliguritimes.com/aipwa-stages-sit-in-protest-in-support-of-various-demands/ , https://archive.siasat.com/news/rape-attack-womens-rights-aipwa-secretary-kavita-krishnan-626938/ , https://www.peacewomen.org/content/india-indian-women-fight-back-against-violence-oppression , https://www.telegraphindia.com/jharkhand/aipwa-to-rally-for-women-s-bill/cid/818331 , https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/rape-is-an-attack-on-women-s-rights-aipwa-secretary-kavita-krishnan-114082200635_1.html , https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Vijayawada/aipwa-decries-dgp-remarks/article2878951.ece , http://www.desh24x7.in/viewpoint/aal-india-progressive-women-assosiation--43512 , https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/aipwa-protest-bengaluru-against-cji-s-remark-rapist-asking-will-you-marry-her-144736 --Soman (talk) 22:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:NONPROFIT and the GNG. More sourcing in addition to those above.


 * Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: We have a list of URLs and citations, but there are no arguments as to how these sources provide the required substantial coverage of the organization. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Neutral at this time having not reviewed the sources. The article as written does not establish organizational notability, and an article should speak for itself without requiring the reader to read the sources, which is not why readers use Wikipedia.  So if the article is kept, it should be expanded.  User:Soman has provided only a URL dump, which is useless, because even if the sources listed as reliable, they may or may not be significant coverage.  Providing only a URL dump, rather than adding the references to the article, can even be seen as insulting to the reviewers, but I assume that they simply were in too much of a hurry.  I either will or will not review the footnoted sources, and will not review the dump.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * keep - AIPWA is an notable and second biggest organised womens association in India. So It's need to add on WIKIPEDIA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudip Karmakar23 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Notability is established:
 * 1) https://www.jstor.org/stable/41920038 (several pages of coverage, using their acronym, 23 mentions)
 * 2) I wasn't able to access it, but seems like a whole article about them in Times of India: Women exploitation focus at All India Progressive Women’s Association meet. The Times of India, [s. l.], 10 maio. 2012. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbig&AN=edsbig.A289127995&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 2 maio. 2022.
 * 3) Likewise here: All India progressive women’s association protests lifeterm to Rupam Pathak. The Times of India, [s. l.], 15 abr. 2012. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbig&AN=edsbig.A286394719&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 2 maio. 2022.
 * While it does seem weird to argue based on the headline without being able to see the text, it's difficult to imagine circumstances where the articles did not cover them. CT55555 (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.