Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Tanzeem-e-Insaaf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. signed,Rosguill talk 02:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

All India Tanzeem-e-Insaaf

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG DSP2092 talk  14:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Islam.  DSP2092 talk  14:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per what I have found at a cursory look: this, this, a bit of this and this is pretty much Good; and these make a good case for my week keep argument. Best, ─ The Aafī   (talk)  14:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * the article does not meet WP:NORG. Most of the article's references are not independent and reliable. It also doesn't have indepth coverage. DSP2092 talk  15:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * There's a reason I didn't argue for a full keep. The sources are independent and reliable (you can comment on the quality though), and I agree with WP:SIGNIFICANT being absent to some extent, however, if we combine all of these, this makes a good Basic case. A borderline notability for me, hence Weak Keep. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  15:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom article's references are not are not independent and reliable it fails to meet WP:GNG.Divesome (talk) 04:44, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.