Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Trinamool Youth Congress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to All India Trinamool Congress.  Sandstein  18:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

All India Trinamool Youth Congress

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None notable youth wing of a political party that has only had a single source since 2016. I'd also be cool with it being merged to Trinamool Congress, but there doesn't seem to be anything worth merging. Adamant1 (talk) 10:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - Trinamool Youth Congress is definitely notable enough to warrant an article. See for example, , , , , , , , , , , etc.. Seems the new name of the organization is 'All India Trinamool Yuva'. --Soman (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, maybe the article should be renamed or something. That aside, I'm not sure a bunch of brief mentions about the organization in otherwise extremely short articles about there rallies is really enough for notability. One of your references is single four line paragraph that says nothing except "they held a rally." WP:NCORP considers events, especially local ones, to be considered trivial coverage due to audience. Id say an "article" about a rally held in Naxalbari would count as that. Especially considering it doesn't even say anything except "there was a rally in Naxalbari." --Adamant1 (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Examples of TV news coverage: report on a block-level conference of Trinamool Yuva in Murshidabad, food distribution organized by Trinamool Yuva during lockdown, another lockdown food distribution event, Block-level Trinamool Yuva food distribution in lockdown in Arambagh, blood donation campaign of Trinamool Yuva in Hoogly, a local Trinamool Yuva protest on JNU violence in Jan 2020, District unit of Trinamool Yuva holding a protest, Trinamool Yuva launches 'Speak with Didi' campaign, a 'Speak with Didi' meeting, etc, etc. --Soman (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I say local events don't count for notability and you provide more sources about local events. Alright. Please read WP:GEOSCOPE. None of those "have a demonstrable long-term impact on a significant region of the world. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:GEOSCOPE refers to the notability of events. For political organizations, we use WP:GNG, WP:NPOL and WP:NORG. --Soman (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I know, but your the one posting a bunch of articles about events instead of the organization. I don't see why you would, unless by doing so your saying the organization should be notable for the events it puts on. To which, I'm saying if the events aren't notable, then the organization putting them on can't be either. You can't have it both ways by saying there's nothing notable about the events themselves, but the organization is notable just for doing them. So, lets get rid of your citations to protests then, because I agree with you that it should be about WP:NORG, not WP:GEOSCOPE. Say we make it purely about WP:NORG, then what sources do we have left that actually talk about the organization in-depth and aren't mainly about protests? --Adamant1 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * See the forest, in spite of the trees. If the fact that an organization holds a conference or a rally is covered in news media, that's a good indicator of notability. If there are hundreds of different news reports of events of an organization, spread across many locations, it is a good indicator of notability. --Soman (talk) 00:55, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * So then there aren't any articles about the organization itself? Alright then. To quote WP:NORG (it's your standard), "An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it", "Examples of trivial coverage including of sponsorship of events, non-profit organizations, or volunteer work, coverage of purely local events, incidents, and controversies (see also #Audience below)." From Audience (again, your standard) "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability." So no, coverage of "events" alone isn't a good indicator of notability. At least not by WP:NORG. which is your own standards. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  qedk ( t  愛  c ) 06:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Trinamool Congress. Not enough coverage on its own to justify an article. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Per Northamerica1000. I think it would be better, as the article has no notability at all. No reliable sourcing since August 2016.Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 02:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have only provided deletion sorting here; you must be referring to . North America1000 06:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.